Menu

Munro v. IMP Aerospace Components Decision

An independent human rights board of inquiry into a claim of discrimination on the basis of pregnancy has concluded no wrongs were committed.

The complaint was referred to a board of inquiry after being screened by the Human Rights Commission.

Board chair Nelson Blackburn was appointed by the Chief Judge of the Provincial Court to consider if IMP Aerospace Components had correctly accommodated Darlene Munro’s pregnancy while implementing corrective measures in her performance.

The chair found IMP had appropriately accommodated Ms. Munroe’s pregnancy.

Mr. Blackburn said IMP had concerns Ms. Munro was frequently away from her desk for unjustified reasons. Ms. Munro alleged her need of more frequent bathroom breaks because of her pregnancy was used as a method by IMP to institute corrective procedures. She was required to check in with her supervisor when she went to the washroom, which she alleged singled her out as a pregnant woman and humiliated her.

Mr. Blackburn found that requiring notification of breaks was an informal policy for all employees who “roam” from their desks. He said it was not connected to her pregnancy. IMP requires a highly regimented workforce to produce and assemble airplane parts.

“This decision articulates an important concern about the way employers provide accommodations to employees when there are also disciplinary issues being addressed,” said Tracey Williams, director and CEO of the commission.

The Nova Scotia Human Rights Act protects against harassment and discrimination by recognizing historic disadvantages and stereotypes unfairly directed toward groups.

For more information on protected characteristics and areas, the Nova Scotia Human Rights Act, and the full decision in this case, visit http://humanrights.gov.ns.ca .

Source: Release

Exit mobile version