I know this is a very subjective topic and feel free to disagree with me. To my mind the book is always better than the movie adaptation of it. A lot of details are lost between the page and the screen. A book works jointly with the mind in building an imaginary world. As for a movie, it does all the work for you – our personal reading becomes attached to another person’s (screenwtiters’, film director’s, costume designers’, etc.) vision and imagination.
So I asked my friends and colleques about their “good book, bad movie” experience and created a list of 7 bad and flat movies based on very good, powerful and adventurous books:
Good book/graphic novel | Bad movie |
Bag of Bones by Stephen King (M) |
|
The Golden Compass by Philip Pullman (M) |
|
Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift (M) |
|
A Princess of Mars. Mars Trilogy by Edgar Rice Burroughs (M) |
|
The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen by Alan Moore (M) |
|
Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro (M) |
|
The Time Traveler’s Wife by Audrey Niffenegger (M) |
However, I have to admit that great films can benefit the reading process. For example, Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings moviehelped me get a clear understanding of the plot of the J.R.R.Tolkien’s complex fantasy work. I had no problem reading the book and imagining vivid characters as Jackson represented them.
By the way, the HBO’s medieval fantasy television series Game of Thrones encouraged me to read the book A Game of Thrones (the first book in the Songs of Ice and Fire series) by George R.R. Martin. What an amazing epic novel! And so I return to my initial statement: the book is always, always better than the movie.
Source: http://www.thereader.ca/2012/11/never-judge-book-by-its-movie_23.html